P6_Lucretia



Student name: Lucretia Turner Type of evaluation (self) Category || Strong || Adequate || Weak || Concept || Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept. || Does an adequate job communicating the concept. || Does a poor job communicating the concept. || Composition || Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. || Photograph does a good job using composition principles. || Photograph does a poor job using composition principles. || Focus || Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || Technical Aspects || Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept.  || Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept. || Depth of Field || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. || Title/tags || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes. || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors. || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || Self Critique || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || Peer Critique || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || Peer Comments || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || ||  ||  || Total Points ||  >89%    (45-50 pts.) ||  80 – 89%    (40 - 44 pts.)  || <80%   (<40 pts.)  || Comments: This photograph meets the requirements because it is a double exposure consisting of two photos that are layered to achieve the double exposure effect. Photoshop Elements 5 was used to produce the final result of this project.
 * Rubric: ** ** Digital Photo Double Exposure **
 * Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||
 * Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||

I am enjoying practicing shooting pictures and using software to enhance the original images. Using digital photography is efficient because a picture can be altered and saved with the original picture still available for further editing. It takes quite a bit of time to edit a picture and get it just right for others to view. My challenge with this double exposure photography project was making the picture seamless. I had to experiment with several pictures before I was satisfied with the one that was submitted. As with all assignments, changing the original photo allows me to understand the artistry of photography and the appreciation of the field.

Student name: Type of evaluation ( peer). Include name of peer: || Does an adequate job communicating the concept. || Does a poor job communicating the concept. || || || Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || || Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept. || || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors. || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || >89% (45-50 pts.) || 80 – 89% (40 - 44 pts.) || <80% (<40 pts.) || Write a two paragraph summary in the comment section stating: how this photograph meets the requirements, and the value of this assignment to you. The self-critique should be posted to the Virtual Group discussion area in CourseDen and a copy of the self and peer critique should be submitted in a Word document with along with the photo file for the assignment.
 * Rubric: ** ** Digital Photo **
 * Category || Strong || Adequate || Weak ||
 * Concept || Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept.
 * Composition || Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. || Photograph does a good job using composition principles. || Photograph does a poor job using composition principles.
 * Focus || Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot.
 * Technical Aspects || Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept.
 * Depth of Field || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. ||
 * Title/tags || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes.
 * ** Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||
 * Self Critique || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements.
 * Peer Critique || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements.
 * Peer Comments
 * Total Points
 * Total Points

Comments: