P10_Lucretia

Student name: Lucretia Turner Type of evaluation (self). Include name of peer: || Does an adequate job communicating the concept. || Does a poor job communicating the concept. || || || Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. || Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || || Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept. || Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept. || || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors.  || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || >89% (45-50 pts.) || 80 – 89% (40 - 44 pts.)  ||  <80% (<40 pts.) || This was challenging for me. Even though I captured a cloudy atmosphere, I don’t think the composition principles are adequate. I took this photograph early morning and it is still difficult for me to determine the correct shutter speed and aperture. The clouds were moving pretty fast so the focus is off a little. You can see the over exposed sun peeking through under the clouds. I tried to enhance the photo in photo shop as well as define the sun; but this is the best I could do. The camera I use has the history of the settings that were used to take this photograph. I especially want to make these types of shots clearer and with more definition. This will be a workshop type photo to use for improvement.
 * Rubric: ** ** Digital Photo **
 * Category || Strong || Adequate || Weak ||
 * Concept || Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept.
 * Composition || Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. || Photograph does a good job using composition principles. || Photograph does a poor job using composition principles.
 * Focus || Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot.
 * Technical Aspects || Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept.
 * Depth of Field || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. ||
 * Title/tags || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes.
 * ** Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||
 * Self Critique || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements.
 * Peer Critique || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements.
 * Peer Comments
 * Total Points
 * Total Points

Student name: Lucretia Turner Type of evaluation peer). Include name of peer:  Category ||  Strong ||  Adequate ||  Weak || Concept ||  Does an outstanding job of communicating the concept.  ||  Does an adequate job communicating the concept. ||  Does a poor job communicating the concept. || Composition ||  Photograph uses composition principles very effectively. ||  Photograph does a good job using composition principles. ||  Photograph does a poor job using composition principles.  || Focus ||  Focus is a perfect match with the concept of the shot.   ||  Focus is an adequate match with the concept of the shot. ||  Focus is a poor match with the concept of the shot. || Technical Aspects ||  Shutter speed and aperture were perfectly chosen to match concept.  ||  Shutter speed and aperture were adequately chosen to match concept.  ||  Shutter speed and aperture were poorly chosen and do not match the concept.  || Depth of Field || Excellent use of depth-of-field. || Adequate use of depth-of-field. || Poor use of depth-of-field. || Title/tags || Title and tags were perfectly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are excellent with no mistakes. || Title and tags were adequately chosen and written to express the content and concept. Spelling and word choice are good with only minor errors. || Title and tags were poorly chosen and written to express the content and concept. Contains multiple spelling errors or wrong word choices. || Self Critique || Excellent self-assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate self-assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor self-assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || Peer Critique || Excellent peer assessment. Written comments meet or exceed requirements. || Adequate peer assessment. Written comments meet requirements. || Poor peer assessment. Written comments do not meet requirements. || Peer Comments || Peer comments exceed expectations. || Peer comments meet expectations. One or two comments might be missing. || Three or more peer comments were missing, incomplete or poorly written. || || ||  ||  || Total Points ||  >89%    (45-50 pts.) ||  80 – 89%    (40 - 44 pts.)  || <80%   (<40 pts.)  || Write a two paragraph summary in the comment section stating: how this photograph meets the requirements, and the value of this assignment to you. The self-critique should be posted to the Virtual Group discussion area in CourseDen and a copy of the self and peer critique should be submitted in a Word document with along with the photo file for the assignment.
 * Rubric: ** ** Digital Photo **
 * Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||
 * Instructor evaluates shaded section ** ||

Comments:

Comments: